We recorded a witness interview. Now we need to use it.
Witness interviews can reveal important details, such as a contradiction, an admission, or an overlooked fact that changes the whole case. The hard part is usually finding them fast enough to build your defense.
Say you have a recorded interview with a witness who says she saw a man run from a corner store right before police showed up. Here's how Reduct helps you review it faster.
Get a summary that answers your questions
Once you upload your file to Reduct, you’ll have the whole recording transcribed.
Generate a summary of the interview tailored to your case. If you're looking for a timeline, suspect description, or inconsistencies with the witness's earlier statement, use those targeted questions to create a custom summary in Reduct.
For the corner store witness, you could create questions such as:
-
What time does she say she saw the man?
-
Does she describe what he was wearing?
-
Which direction did she see the man run in?
-
How far away was she standing when she saw him?
-
Did she get a look at his face?
-
Does her description match what she told the officer at the scene?

The summary pulls the answers straight from her interview and gives you the link to the exact moment in the transcript, leading you to the exact second in the recording.
Reduct can also give you chronological and thematic summaries, if that is useful to your case.
Why it matters: Summaries help you get oriented quickly, whether you're preparing for a full review, briefing a supervisor, or sharing the file with co-counsel.
Highlight and label sections as you go
As you go through the interview, highlight important statements, organize them under labels such as Timeline, Prior Statements, Relationship to Defendant, or Inconsistencies, and color-code them. You can add multiple labels in the same highlight, if needed.
For example:
-
The witness said she'd never met the defendant before, but she referenced calling him 'Danny' twice. Those moments can be highlighted and labeled as “relationship to defendant” and “inconsistencies”.
-
She initially says she saw the man at 9 pm, but 20 minutes later in the interview she says it was closer to 9:30. That's worth labeling “inconsistencies” and "timeline."

You can also add details or collaborate with your team on specific highlights or labels by adding comments.
Why it matters: Labels keep you organized and save you from re-watching the whole interview every time you need to check something. They can also make your trial prep smoother.
Search for specific details in seconds
Use the search box to pull up every instance of a name, date, or phrase, across one interview or your entire case file, the moment you type it in.
Beyond search, you can ask the recording a direct question and get an instant answer, pulled from the interview and linked to the exact moment.
For example, the defense's theory hinges on whether the witness could actually see the corner store from where she was standing.
You can ask the recording, "Did she say how far away she was from the store?" and get a verifiable answer.

Why it matters: A detail buried in one interview and a matching detail buried in another become equally easy to find, which is the difference between catching a contradiction and missing one.
Clip and download important moments or make reels
Once you know which moments matter, download them or clip them into a reel. A reel strings together highlighted moments into a single, shareable sequence, in whatever order makes sense for your purpose (a motion, a case discussion, a debrief with your team).

For example, ahead of a suppression hearing, you could build a reel with just her two conflicting statements about the time, back to back, so anyone reviewing the case sees the inconsistency in under a minute instead of reading about it in a memo.
Why it matters: A reel is shareable and lets you hand over exactly the moments someone needs to see, without sharing the full video or needing any video editing skills.
The part that's still on you
Witness interviews generally need more than one pass, but only a few defenders have time to watch the full recording over and over.
Reduct helps you spend less time searching and more time thinking about what the evidence actually means. It can give you answers on what's worth a second look. It can't tell you what an inconsistency means or how it fits your defense theory. That judgment call is still yours.